K150-2 [message #16794] |
Mon, 19 March 2012 21:25 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I've been giving those metal face amps a bad wrap for years. I guess I just don't like the use of the IC chips in them. I much prefer the independent transistor warmth of the Plexy face with the exception of one metal face amp, the K150-2. I have 2 of them complete with the Cabinets and just acquired a third one, but just the head. These, I have to admit, are the only metal face amps that really capture that warm plexy sound and believe me I have and tried them all. I opened it up to repair it and noticed it has 2 transformers. Is this the reason why they are soooooo much warmer than the Challenger, Hustler, Charger, Commander and the K250's far as that goes? I got it up and running with all effects working great. I only have a slight issue with channel 2, dirty pot, molex connector or broken solder joint maybe, If I spike a F note she crackles and distorts. Other than that she sounds like the real deal. Steve C
Steve C
[Updated on: Mon, 19 March 2012 21:28] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16796 is a reply to message #16794] |
Tue, 20 March 2012 06:30 |
stevem
Messages: 4772 Registered: June 2004 Location: NY
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The extra Transformer as you put it is a called a choke, like a lot of tube amps have in them.
These do not add warmth to the tone, but they do help make the amp punchy, as their function is to maintain a stable current level feeding the amps circiuts.
Why chokes where part of the Kustom plan for the k150s, and all three metal face PA heads (150, 300 and 600) and not the k250 is a question I would love to get a resolve to.
You can add them to a K250 if you like,(choke specs need to match) and the cheapest way to go would be to install two of them that would normally be used in a tube amp seing as the Kustom chokes where probibly custom ordered due to the need of having 2 inputs and two outputs.
In reagrds to the warmer tome of the early Kustom amps, much of that difference is due to the type of coupling caps used.
The latter heads used a large amount of whats called orange drop caps, and these higher grade caps have a more strident and accurate tone to them.
In the K200b and metal face amps changing out a 20 dollar fist full of caps will get the tonal responce difference you are missing, as the IC chips used have the same frequency responce as the transistors used in the early amps!
[Updated on: Tue, 20 March 2012 06:32] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16797 is a reply to message #16796] |
Tue, 20 March 2012 15:59 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'm not a Electronics tech so I can't argue with this from a tech's point of view. I rate an amps sound by what I hear from it under my playing style so its definitly opinionated. What I hear you say and what I actually hear are 2 totally different paths. I don't dought your theory on the caps, but here's the deal. I use the same brand "Orange Drop" Caps in most every case when recapping a cicuit board. They're a little pricy in my book when it can be replaced for pennies and sound OK, but well worth it when its equipment I want to sound GREAT when I use it. Most amps I acquire with the intent to be working equipment in my band and not show pieces. I've done several A and B series in the last 2 years using the same quality caps on both models and each time put the amps to the test and each time I have to say the same thing. The B models just don't have the warmth of the A models. This is really noticable in the old Frank models. The 300's that I have ( I have 2 of them) only have a huge single transformer which is tucked into its own metal compartment with the huge filter caps. Is this 2nd transformer in the K150's strickly to give the circuitry more available energy? Seems there was an easier way like, maybe put a bigger transformer so it wouldn't need a second one. That gets me thinking of another experiment. I have a transformer from one of those XII SRS Tri-amp Slave units. That thing is a monster, its gigantic and enough energy available for 3 of those 5065 boards. Lets see, I have an extra PC-703, filter caps and a 4 transistor heatsink strip. Lengthen the output and diode wires and a set of 6-32 coupling spacers to piggieback the 703's on top of each other Maybe a K200-1 can turn into a "K400-1 PLUS" with tons of extra supply energy for warmth. Sure would make a hell of a Bass head. CRAP! then I'd have to carry around 2 cabinets for it, unless, can it be bridged? HMMMM. Just a thought, what do ya'll think. Thats my pennies worth. Steve C
Steve C
[Updated on: Wed, 21 March 2012 23:49] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16798 is a reply to message #16795] |
Tue, 20 March 2012 16:55 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'll go with you on the Challenger thing. I will give it credit for its volume and clearity, not that the other metal face amps don't all have the same qualities in those departments. I had two challengers at one time and still have one I sent to my Dad in Michigan. I've got a Hustler which sounds better with a 4X12 than the 4X10's specially on a 412 celestion Carvin Cab. Charger, well not much to brag about there. Thats strickly Bass app there and although it has a lot of punch I can't give it an A for warmth. The Commander is just that, if you want to just blow someone away in volume its killer. She's mean and clean, but plexy warmth its not even in the same league. This is coming from 18 to 20 years of playing Kustoms in my band and acually giging with these amps. K250's I've had four or five and still have 2 of the best ones I've had. One has the 215-B cabinet and the other a 118-B cabinet (The Huge Tuck N Roll Model, not the folded horn one) which is the best of the two. They're a whole lot a punch but still not that smooth as butter sound like a plexy 200. Well thats my bucks worth. Steve C
Steve C
|
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16800 is a reply to message #16799] |
Wed, 21 March 2012 23:55 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
OK. I stand corrected on the second transformer of the frank heads. Thanks for the info. The PC-5065"s dont have a regulator do they? The transformer ran three 5065's. Could it run 2 without burning things up and if so can they be bridged for a single output (MONO)?
Steve C
|
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16802 is a reply to message #16801] |
Thu, 22 March 2012 20:39 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I have the old Johnny Cash Tuck and Roll 300's and don't remember seeing a second transformer, not to say it wasn't there. I guess I never really paid that much attention. Stuffing the guts from a 300 into a 250 chassis is going to be a challenge, but sounds like something I would do. I don't know that I would go through all that for 20 more watts. I cant wait to see some pictures and hear about the end result.
Steve C
|
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16806 is a reply to message #16794] |
Fri, 23 March 2012 07:01 |
stevem
Messages: 4772 Registered: June 2004 Location: NY
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Well I have some added tricks I will stick in the K250 mod to bring it to near 200 watts RMS.
Just before bed time least night it came to mind that the power section I will pull out of the K250 when I stuff the 300s in could be slipped into my other K100-8 combo!
You must have the reissue cash 300 not a K300-5 model if there is no choke in the baby!
[Updated on: Fri, 23 March 2012 07:03] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16812 is a reply to message #16805] |
Fri, 23 March 2012 21:04 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yes it is a Bi-amp design far as frequency outputs I understand that, but it is called tri-amp in the manual and schematics. Its model is" XII SRS Slave Tri-amplifier. Meaning Low Left output, Low right output and Horn outputs are driven independently which makes it a three or tri-amplifier and the manual states each output handling a min. 4 ohm load "aint that just cool". I've used one of these units, (I have 2 of them), one time just for the "BI-AMP" capabilities and it will drive four 8 ohm Cabinets plus the horns with ease. The only thing bad I can say is the low end frequency responce isnt as good as the equipment we have now. I,ve used this thing for Bass and "YES" its a thunder bolt. Its right up there with my K-IV Bass, but theres no need for that kind of power on stage for the most part in most clubs I play. Its like driving a Farrari in rush hour traffic downtown Dallas. The K200's on the 215-B cabinet is all I need to get the job done. That reminds me, I got one of those Blue haired gigs tomorrow night. We definitly don't need any volume there!!! A bunch of Dallas Court reporters and such from District 23, that will be a real blast. No smoking and limited boose, guess we're the only fun they'll have. Steve C
Steve C
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16813 is a reply to message #16806] |
Fri, 23 March 2012 21:15 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey stevem, your absolutly right about the choke (Why is it called "Choke") in the 300's I have. They are the early Baldwin era T&R metal face 6 channel versions. That metal enclosure has 2 transformers and the filter caps in it. Thats weird how the rectifier outputs are directed into the second transformer and its outputs going to the Power Filter Caps. I did notice there is no zenier Diodes on the supply voltage resistor banks for the pre-amp section, why is that? By the way, it doesn't look too bad to fit its components into a smaller case like a 250, 200 or maybe even a 100 for all that goes. Steve C
Steve C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16819 is a reply to message #16818] |
Sun, 25 March 2012 12:00 |
cassent5150
Messages: 341 Registered: August 2009
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The symbol isn't really a U and F to be exact. It just resembles a u that is backward and the line pertrudes below the letter. uf is the alternate spelling for the micro farad symbol.
Steve C
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16820 is a reply to message #16794] |
Sun, 25 March 2012 14:04 |
chicagobill
Messages: 2005 Registered: April 2003
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The lower case u looks similar to the greek letter mu, which is used to represent micro in micro-farad. So either uF or mF are common abbreviations.
|
|
|
Re: K150-2 [message #16821 is a reply to message #16820] |
Sun, 25 March 2012 17:18 |
Kustom_Bart
Messages: 601 Registered: October 2010 Location: Greenville, MichiGUN
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thank you guys, if I come and ask 1 question every day, I should be pretty smart about the time I die....lol! I love messing with this stuff, I really need to learn how to read a schematic though!
|
|
|